Amazon.co.uk Widgets

On a (rare) beautiful December morning, six 928 owners headed for Surrey Rolling Road in Chobham. As it turned out, we had a fantastic mix of pretty much every engine configuration that Porsche made for the 928. This was going to be a rare opportunity to compare the power and torque of the different engine versions fitted to 928's.

Porsche 928 dyno day at Surrey Rolling Road December 2009

The earliest example we had was Joel's '79 928 with a hybrid 4.7 engine (courtesy of Dr A!). This engine was only 500 miles old from a fresh build-up and understandably, Joel was keen to see the results. The rest of the pack were all S4's with the following configurations:

  • Chas Behl 94 GTS manual
  • Joel Hopwood 79 4.7 manual
  • Charlie Edgley 91 S4 auto
  • Stuart Rankine 88 S4 manual + x-pipes
  • Tony Macpherson 87 with 91GT that had a been fitted with a '91 GT engine and manual gearbox + x-pipes
  • And Simon Painter 91GT with x-pipes

Porsche 928 dyno day at Surrey Rolling Road December 2009

Porsche 928 dyno day at Surrey Rolling Road December 2009

Joel's was first up as he needed to get on his way (although he ended up staying for the duration after some pleading phone calls!). Although his torque figures were completely text-book, his power was down across the whole rev range. Mr Dyno man suggested that it looked like it could be air flow restriction somewhere in the inlet or exhaust system?? Anyway we all took turns on the rollers with varying degrees of success.

Porsche 928 dyno day at Surrey Rolling Road December 2009

When each of our cars were finished, we each got a set of graphs showing maximum rear wheel horsepower (rwhp) which are the most important figures, the torque figures, air/fuel ratio figures (AFR) and the estimated engine flywheel hp (fwhp). The estimated fwhp is a much debated figure with the most common figure of 15% being the loss incurred through the drive-train to the wheels. So if an engine produces 300 fwhp, then the rwhp will be about 15% less at 255. Given this, our estimated rwhp figures seem a little optimistic?? But hey, this is what the Dyno system estimated.

Porsche 928 dyno day at Surrey Rolling Road December 2009

When we all finished, I got the Dyno guy to print out a single graph with an overlay of all our torque and fwhp curves. This then allows easy comparison of each engine onb a single graph. Some of the curves are so close that it is difficult to identify which is which, but I have had a go at labeling each cars curves - hopefully it will be reasonable clear.

Porsche 928 dyno day at Surrey Rolling Road December 2009

Although all power curves were slightly different, the takeaway here is that all the engines were completely standard (apart from a few cheeky x-pipes) and were all pretty old (OK, except Joels!) and all produced excellent power (Ok, again Joel's was a bit low on the day!!). These engines are all fantastic pieces of german engineering and are proving to last the tests of time

Porsche 928 dyno day at Surrey Rolling Road December 2009

There are a few of us planning to optimise the fueling and ignition (courtesy of Mr Speake's Sharktuning) a then re-run the dyno's to see the differences achieved. So early on in the New Year there will be another session if anyone cares to join us. I will send out an invite closer to the date.


2008 Results

CarDetails
Angus, Silver S4 SE 346.2 BHP
Matthew, Green 91 GT 341.3 BHP
Simon, Green 91 GT 321.9 BHP
Peter, 91 S4 (Tested in September) 315 BHP (Estimated, Auto)

Licences, trademarks, source code licences and attributions

928uk® is a registered trademark of Multizone in the UK. Multizone and this site is not affiliated with or endorsed by The Joomla! Project™. Any products and services provided through this site are not supported or warrantied by The Joomla! Project or Open Source Matters, Inc. Use of the Joomla!® name, symbol, logo and related trademarks is permitted under a limited licence granted by Open Source Matters, Inc. AdMob™, AdSense™, AdWords™, Android™, Chrome OS™, Chromebook™, Chrome™, DART™, Flutter™, Firebase™, Firestore™, Fuchsia™, Gmail™, Google Maps™, Google Pixel™, Google Play™, Pixelbook Go™, and Pixel™ and other trademarks listed at the Google Brand Resource center are trademarks of Google LLC and this site is not endorsed by or affiliated with Google in any way. Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. The OSI logo trademark is the trademark of Open Source Initiative. Any other product or company names may be trademarks™ or registered® trademarks of their respective holders. Use of these trademarks in articles here does not apply affiliation or endorsement by any of them.

Where the source code is published here on 928.org.uk or on our GitHub by Angus Fox, Multizone Limited it is licenced according to the open source practice for the project concerned.

BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" Licence
Original source code for mobile apps are licenced using the same licence as the one used by "The Flutter Authors". This Licence, the BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" Licence (bsd-3-clause) is a permissive licence with a clause that prohibits others from using the name of the project or its contributors to promote derived products without written consent.
GNU General Public Licence v2.0 or later
Original source code for Joomla! published here on 928.org.uk by Angus Fox, Multizone Limited is licenced using the same licence as the one used by Joomla!. This Licence, the GNU General Public Licence Version 2 or later (gpl-2.0) is the most widely used free software licence and has a strong copyleft requirement. When distributing derived works, the source code of the work must be made available under the same licence.

You can use any code you find here, just respect the licences and dont use the name of this site or our company to promote derived products without written consent. I mean, why would you? You're not us!

Amazon Associate
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Logo
The Multizone logo Image is by Freepik. We chose it because its an M and also the letter A twice - and that represents us.